Sirdeaner Walker found her 11-year-old son Carl Joseph in his room,
dead, hanging from an electrical cord. Driven to suicide, it's
believed, because he was being "bullied relentless" in school. He
was being pushed around, told he acted "gay," and branded a
"faggot." And when she told the school, administrators told her "it
would work itself out," she says. Ms. Walker has relived this
nightmare a number of times publicly, for which we thank her, since
she has to relive it everyday for the rest of her life. Here, she
tells Congress about the reality of bullying: It doesn't have to be
this way for our kids. "This has got to stop. School bullying is a
national crisis. … I know that bullying is not a gay issue, or a
straight issue. It's a safety issue."
There can be no doubt that teacher quality is critically important for
academic success of at-risk students, especially when it comes to
teaching literacy skills. However, since No Child Left Behind increased
the focus on teacher quality, we really have not been able to agree on a
definition of what teacher quality is. Education Trust has focused much
energy and study on the topic of teacher quality, but they have not been
very clear on how they determine teacher quality.
I would argue that much confusion has come from the conflation of the
terms “highly qualified” and “high quality.” Legislation passed since
2001 has called for more “highly qualified” teachers, and the focus has
shifted away from “high quality” teachers. The term “highly qualified”
does have a clear definition – highly qualified teachers are teachers
with degrees and certification in the areas in which they teach. Thus,
high school math teachers should have degrees in math (or at least
substantial college credit hours in math), history teachers should have
a clear and documented background in history. But what about elementary
school reading teachers? There is no degree in elementary school
reading at most universities.
...
“Highly qualified” teachers are those with degrees and certifications in
the areas in which they teach. “High quality” teachers, however, are
those with talent, knowledge, and skill. Alas, when it comes to reading
instruction, there is very little evidence that the two are related. In
other words, recruiting and retaining “highly qualified” teachers is no
guarantee of “high quality.”
While we define “highly qualified” teachers by the degrees and
certificates they hold, I think it is important for us to think more
broadly about “high quality” teachers. Over the years, I have observed
hundreds of teachers teaching students to read. When I walk into a
class and watch a teacher, I have little knowledge of the certificates
or degrees that teacher has earned. However, I can tell very quickly
whether that teacher is a “high quality” reading teacher.
Too many graduates are unprepared for college, careers,
and life.
►Not
ready for college: More than one in three college students (34%) must
take remedial math or
English courses to catch up on skills they should have learned in high
school. In community colleges,
the remediation rate climbs to 43%.3
►Not
ready for careers: Nearly half of recent high school graduates who enter
the workforce (46%) say
they are not prepared for the jobs they hope to get in the future.
Employers agree, estimating that 45%
of recent high school graduates are not prepared with skills to advance
beyond entry level jobs.4
►Not
ready for life: American students have a hard time solving real-life
problems that call for practical
decision making and troubleshooting. Among 29 developed countries, the
U.S. had the fourth-highest percentage of very weak problem-solvers
and the sixth-lowest percentage of strong
problem-solvers.5
A new
Southern Regional
Education Board report focuses on problems with middle
schools and suggests that while Texas' standards for middle school math
are "about right," its middle school reading standards are too low.
You'll
find a summary of the report in the press release below:
Too Many of Region's Students Unprepared for High School; Achievement
Not Rising Quickly Enough, New Report Finds
ATLANTA -- Modest gains in reading and mathematics achievement on state
assessments and low academic standards are signs that too many middle
grades students are not well-prepared for high school courses, a major
new report by the nonprofit Southern Regional Education Board shows.
...
Six SREB states appear to have set standards at about the right levels
in reading: Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland and
Mississippi. South Carolina's standards appear too high.
Nine SREB states' reading standards appeared too low: Alabama, Delaware,
Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West
Virginia.
In eighth-grade math, eight states appear to have set standards about
right: Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, North
Carolina and Texas. South Carolina's appeared too high.
Seven SREB states' math standards
appear too low: Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee,
Virginia and West Virginia.